Soft Logic
2019-02-23 22:54:33 UTC
Is cancer sometimes really just an aesthetic defect? Are certain cancerous growths really just removed because such appear “ugly” to others, kind of like on the television show “Dr. Pimple Popper”? I suspect, perhaps even in error, that lives might sometimes be risked undergoing what might be dangerous medical procedures and countless tax dollars spent in an effort to find a cure, simply for the somewhat base purpose of beautifying, or at least deuglifying, America. But what if a patient does not mind being ugly as such?
I personally am under the perhaps incorrect notion that being ugly because of having a tumorous growth might sometimes be more wrong in certain societies of the Occident than such might be in quite a bit of the world abroad. But to me, being alive might often matter more than not being ugly alone does.
I personally am under the perhaps incorrect notion that being ugly because of having a tumorous growth might sometimes be more wrong in certain societies of the Occident than such might be in quite a bit of the world abroad. But to me, being alive might often matter more than not being ugly alone does.